What is the author’s stance on AI with regard to efficiency?

What is the author’s stance on AI with regard to efficiency?

• A. AI should be avoided altogether.
• B. AI guarantees perfect efficiency.
• C. AI is beneficial only without management.
• D. AI can enhance efficiency if properly managed.

Answer: (D)

The main idea being tested is that AI can boost efficiency when it’s properly managed. AI brings speed, powerful data processing, and automation that can cut wasted time and improve decision-making. But those benefits don’t happen automatically; without governance, AI can generate errors, biases, or misaligned actions that actually reduce efficiency or create new problems. So the author emphasizes the need for clear objectives, oversight, monitoring, and safeguards—often with human input guiding and correcting AI systems. That’s why the best stance is that AI can enhance efficiency if it’s properly managed. Avoiding AI altogether ignores the potential gains, claiming it guarantees perfect efficiency is unrealistic, and saying it’s beneficial only without management contradicts the point that oversight is essential to realizing true efficiency.

The main idea being tested is that AI can boost efficiency when it’s properly managed. AI brings speed, powerful data processing, and automation that can cut wasted time and improve decision-making. But those benefits don’t happen automatically; without governance, AI can generate errors, biases, or misaligned actions that actually reduce efficiency or create new problems. So the author emphasizes the need for clear objectives, oversight, monitoring, and safeguards—often with human input guiding and correcting AI systems. That’s why the best stance is that AI can enhance efficiency if it’s properly managed.

Avoiding AI altogether ignores the potential gains, claiming it guarantees perfect efficiency is unrealistic, and saying it’s beneficial only without management contradicts the point that oversight is essential to realizing true efficiency.